Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andy Parker's avatar

Hey there, veteran here and wanted to reflect on this because in part, I wholly agree.

Why we sell the process of design

10 years ago we were 10 years into the struggle of getting investment from businesses into designing the right thing to build the right thing (in digital products, far, far longer for physical products).

Nobody was willing to pay for the time required to actually figure out what needed to be created. Before 2005 we called this R&D, Research and Development - and nobody wanted to pay for research, and definately not if it didn't result in a THING at the end.

In 2024 it's the same challenge with a different motivation.

Businesses are broke, trying to operate in a broken global market and nobody wants to pay to design the right thing before building the right thing. They want to pay for a thing they can sell immediately and generate revenue.

Whilst I don't disagree with the sentiment that the end result of the product that's delivered can be deemphasised a lot in particular in digital product design, there is still a need to influence and persuade those people that own budgets that spending time figuring out what needs to be made is still the most cost effective way of ensuring you don't build the wrong thing.

This is ultimately the designers struggle, and will always be that way

Expand full comment
Elli Thomas's avatar

I kind of agree! Though I think it's nuanced. I think the real value of formalising a design process is to help those who don't have the kind of learned, internalised design instinct that designers will have. For those who already have that, the process is unnecessary, and probably a bit frustrating.

For context I worked for several years for Design Council in the UK, who pioneered the Double Diamond design process. It's been a transformative tool for many but I think the primary value has been to bring design to non-designers. To anyone with these instincts already, it was obvious from the beginning!

It's often hard for non-designers to have the confidence to work in a messy, fuzzy design context, and when they don't necessarily know what good looks and feels like, the process gives confidence and guide rails. Over time, and with enough practice, those instincts develop. Even if they don't, they gain a lot from the structure.

One of the trickiest things is trying to get designers (to whom this is second nature) to effectively communicate what they are doing and the value of it to non-designers (who probably think it is woolly, and results in expensive nice-looking things. So it also breaks down the intuitive value of the process to non-designers and helps build confidence in their involvement.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts